Graph Arboricity Calculator

min forests covering E(G)

CalculatorsFreeNo Signup
4.9(242 reviews)
All Tools

Loading tool...

About Graph Arboricity Calculator

A graph arboricity calculator computing a(G): minimum forests partitioning E(G). Nash-Williams (1964): a(G) = max over H⊆G of ⌈|E(H)|/(|V(H)|-1)⌉. a(tree)=1, a(K_n)=⌈n/2⌉, a(planar)≤3. Client-side.

Graph Arboricity Calculator Features

  • a(G) value
  • Nash-Williams
  • Common graphs
  • Planar bound
  • Forest partition
Arboricity a(G): minimum edge-disjoint forests covering all edges. Nash-Williams (1964): a(G) = max_{H⊆G} ⌈|E(H)|/(|V(H)|-1)⌉. a(tree)=1. a(K_n)=⌈n/2⌉. Planar: a≤3. Measures 'density' from a forest decomposition perspective.

How to Use

Select graph:

  • a(G): Arboricity
  • Formula: Nash-Williams
  • Planar: a ≤ 3

Nash-Williams Formula

a(G) = max over all subgraphs H with |V(H)|≥2 of ⌈|E(H)|/(|V(H)|-1)⌉. This is a min-max formula computable in polynomial time via matroid intersection. Elegant connection to matroid theory.

Applications

Data structure design: arboricity bounds query time. Graph orientation: can orient edges so max in-degree = a(G). Sparse graph algorithms: many run in O(a·n) time. Network reliability: forest decompositions give redundancy.

Step-by-Step Instructions

  1. 1Select graph.
  2. 2Compute a(G).
  3. 3Check Nash-Williams.
  4. 4Find forests.
  5. 5Compare to density.

Graph Arboricity Calculator — Frequently Asked Questions

How does arboricity relate to density?+

a(G) = max ⌈|E(H)|/(|V(H)|-1)⌉ ≈ max local density. If |E|/|V| is large, arboricity is large. For d-regular graphs: a ≈ d/2. Arboricity is a more refined measure than simple edge density.

Why is planar arboricity ≤ 3?+

Planar graphs have |E|≤3|V|-6, so max |E(H)|/(|V(H)|-1) ≤ 3(|V(H)|-2)/(|V(H)|-1) < 3. Hence a≤3. This means every planar graph's edges can be partitioned into 3 forests. Can't always do 2 (K_4 needs 3).

What about linear arboricity?+

Linear arboricity la(G): minimum forests where each is a union of paths (linear forest). Akiyama conjecture: la(G) = ⌈Δ/2⌉. Proved for Δ≤6 and some families. Stronger than arboricity.

Share this tool: